BROWN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 76, IN TYLER COUNTY, TEXAS. 95-1190.Ī true and correct copy of the Warranty Deed with Vendor’s Lien is attached hereto as Exhibit C.īEING 10.00 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, OUT OF AND A PART OF TWO 5.04 ACRE TRACTS, PART OF A 5.44 ACRE TRACT AND ALL OF Aĥ.20 ACRE TRACT IN THE WILLIAM H. The Warranty Deed with Vendor’s Lien was filed for record in the Tyler County, Texas property records in Book 581, under Instrument No. Means, individually, conveyed the remainder of the 10.00-Acre Tract to Carol Teter by virtue of a Warranty Deed with Vendor’s Lien. Subsequently, on February 16, 1995, John Houston Means a/k/a John H. The Warranty Deed conveyed 2.00 acres out of the 10.00-Acre Tract, as moreġ0. 94-5578Ī true and correct copy of the Warranty Deed is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
The Warranty Deed was filed for record in the Tyler County, Texas property records in Book 577, under Instrument No. Means, individually, executed a Warranty Deed conveying a portion of the property to Carol Teter. On or about December 30, 1994, John Houston Means a/k/a John H. The Property is located in Tyler County, Texas, which is within this Division and District.ĩ. Section 1391(a)(2) because a substantial part of the events and omissions that give rise to the controversy occurred in this Division and District. Venue is proper in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division, under 28 U.S.C. The value of the property exceeds $75,000.00 in the present case.ħ. When a party seeks equitable, declaratory, or injunctive relief, “‘the amount in controversy is measured by the value of the object of the litigation.’”Ĭleveland Hous. Plaintiff is the owner of certain real property and improvements located at 586 CR 4368, Woodville, Texas 75979 (the “Property”) acquired at a foreclosure sale. Defendant is an individual and citizen of the state of California.Ħ. Plaintiff Fannie Mae is a government-sponsored enterprise existing under the laws of the United States of America with its principal place of business in Washington, District of Columbia (“D.C.”). Section 1332 because there is complete diversity between Plaintiff and Defendants and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00.Ĥ. This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute under 28 U.S.C.
0 kommentar(er)
